Tokenless 2FA has really taken off in recent years, but in situations where there are delays in receiving SMS or signal loss, does tokenless 2FA stack up against using hardware tokens? Are there more security issues when using software tokens versus hardware tokens? Which solution is the most cost-effective?
In this quick guide, we look at the pros and cons of using hardware tokens versus tokenless 2FA to see how they compare in different situations, and find that software tokens are a strong contender in all areas, from cost savings/TCO and security through to usability and offline authentication.
We compare:
More about SecurEnvoy MFA >
Learn about different MFA authentication methods >
Request a free trial of MFA >
Read more:
Water authorities tighten up on security with tokenless 2FA from SecurEnvoy >
Tokenless 2FA is officially a business grade service >
PCI-compliant payment processing: Tokenless 2FA overcomes the compliance issues >
Tokenless 2FA could have stopped so many breaches >
Flexible Access Management Security that allows you to select the deployment method that is right for your organisation
Choosing Control Over Cloud In today’s rapidly evolving digital era, the shift towards cloud-first strategies is unmistakable. However, amidst t...
Jordan Delany
Access Management / Cloud / On-premise
A changing cybersecurity landscape demands ongoing flexibility that Managed Security Services can deliver
In recent years, traditional cybersecurity resellers have shifted their focus. Once, they concentrated on offering point vendor solutions; now, they a...
Adam Bruce
Access Management / Cloud / On-premiseGet in touch with our sales team to book a demo, request a 30-day trial, or just to chat about how we can help you.
